Authorised social-engineering testing · Dublin

I test how organisations respond to phishing, before an attacker does.

Realistic pretexts, built from open-source intelligence and run under written authorisation, show how your people and processes behave when a message or a phone call isn’t what it seems.

Discuss a test Read the writing

A hand pauses over an office telephone beside a laptop and calendar.

Pretext design, response testing and debriefs

A magnifying glass examines a paper script.

Pretext design

A pretext is the story that makes a request believable. I research an organisation from public sources and write scenarios that reflect what a real attacker could plausibly build, not a generic template.

A telephone receiver beside a question mark.

Response testing

Phishing, vishing and smishing exercises, scoped and authorised in writing. I look at the whole response: who clicks, who reports, who challenges a caller, and how quickly the right people find out.

A notebook and pencil with a tick.

Findings and debrief

A plain-language report and a conversation with your team. The aim is to learn what the exercise shows about process and culture, not to name individuals.

See how each service works →

How an engagement runs

  1. Scope and authorise. Objectives, boundaries and who is aware, agreed in writing.
  2. Research. Public information only, to build a scenario that fits the organisation.
  3. Run the exercise. Monitored throughout, with a clear way to stop it.
  4. Debrief. What happened, why it worked or didn’t, and what to change.
Scope, research, monitored exercise and debrief shown in four vignettes.

Recent writing on phishing and pretexting

All articles →

Start with a conversation

Tell me what prompted the question. We agree objectives, boundaries and authorisation before anything is tested.

Get in touch

Scroll to Top